Tag Archive for: management

The Role of Global Digital Identity Management in Telecommunications and Internet Security


Building Trust in the Digital Age: The Role of Global Digital Identity Management in Telecommunications and Internet Security

In the digital age, trust has become a paramount concern for individuals and businesses alike. As we increasingly rely on digital platforms for communication, commerce, and entertainment, the need for robust security measures has never been more critical. One of the key components in this digital security landscape is the concept of global digital identity management, particularly in the realms of telecommunications and internet security.

Global digital identity management refers to the process of creating, managing, and securing digital identities. A digital identity is essentially a collection of data attributes that uniquely identify an individual, device, or entity in the digital world. This can include everything from usernames and passwords to biometric data and behavioral patterns. In the context of telecommunications and internet security, digital identity management plays a crucial role in verifying the identities of users, ensuring the integrity of communications, and protecting against fraud and cyber threats.

The importance of digital identity management in telecommunications cannot be overstated. With the advent of 5G technology and the Internet of Things (IoT), the number of connected devices is set to explode, each requiring a unique digital identity. Managing these identities securely is crucial to prevent unauthorized access and ensure the privacy and integrity of communications. Moreover, as telecommunications companies move towards more personalized services, the ability to accurately identify and authenticate users becomes even more critical.

In the realm of internet security, digital identity management is equally vital. As we spend more of our lives online, our digital identities become targets for cybercriminals. Identity theft, phishing attacks, and data breaches are just some of the threats that individuals and businesses face. By implementing robust digital identity management systems, we can better protect ourselves against these threats. These systems can help verify the identities of users, authenticate transactions,…

Source…

Best Practices for Implementation and Management


SSL/TLS Encryption: Best Practices for Implementation and Management

SSL/TLS encryption is a critical component of internet security, providing a secure communication channel between web browsers and servers. It ensures that sensitive data, such as login credentials, credit card information, and personal details, are protected from eavesdropping, tampering, and forgery. As cyber threats continue to evolve, it is essential for organizations to implement and manage SSL/TLS encryption effectively. This article outlines the best practices for SSL/TLS encryption implementation and management, helping organizations to safeguard their online presence and protect their users’ data.

First and foremost, organizations should ensure that they are using the latest version of SSL/TLS protocols. Older versions, such as SSL 2.0, SSL 3.0, and TLS 1.0, have known vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers. Upgrading to the most recent version, TLS 1.3, offers significant security improvements, including stronger encryption algorithms, faster connection times, and enhanced privacy. Additionally, it is important to disable any outdated protocols on web servers to prevent their use in potential downgrade attacks.

When configuring SSL/TLS encryption, organizations should prioritize the use of strong cipher suites. A cipher suite is a combination of encryption algorithms that determine the security properties of an SSL/TLS connection. The choice of cipher suites can have a significant impact on the security and performance of encrypted communications. Organizations should avoid using weak or outdated cipher suites, such as those that rely on the RC4 stream cipher or the SHA-1 hash function, as these have been deemed insecure by industry experts. Instead, they should opt for modern cipher suites that utilize robust encryption algorithms, such as AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305, and secure hash functions, like SHA-256 or SHA-384.

Another crucial aspect of SSL/TLS encryption management is the proper handling of digital certificates. Digital certificates are electronic documents that bind a public key to an entity’s identity, enabling secure communication between parties. Organizations should…

Source…

Intech Investment Management LLC Has $761,000 Stock Holdings in Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZS)


Intech Investment Management LLC lowered its stake in shares of Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZSGet Rating) by 43.0% in the fourth quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 6,805 shares of the company’s stock after selling 5,144 shares during the period. Intech Investment Management LLC’s holdings in Zscaler were worth $761,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

Other hedge funds have also added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Mirae Asset Global Investments Co. Ltd. lifted its position in shares of Zscaler by 14.1% during the 1st quarter. Mirae Asset Global Investments Co. Ltd. now owns 557,345 shares of the company’s stock worth $134,476,000 after buying an additional 68,982 shares in the last quarter. AlphaCrest Capital Management LLC bought a new position in shares of Zscaler during the 1st quarter worth approximately $244,000. D.A. Davidson & CO. lifted its position in shares of Zscaler by 41.6% during the 1st quarter. D.A. Davidson & CO. now owns 1,130 shares of the company’s stock worth $273,000 after buying an additional 332 shares in the last quarter. MetLife Investment Management LLC bought a new position in shares of Zscaler during the 1st quarter worth approximately $1,232,000. Finally, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP raised its holdings in shares of Zscaler by 1.8% in the 1st quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 121,598 shares of the company’s stock worth $29,338,000 after purchasing an additional 2,153 shares during the period. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 45.33% of the company’s stock.

Zscaler Stock Performance

ZS opened at $125.27 on Monday. The firm has a 50-day simple moving average of $106.21 and a two-hundred day simple moving average of $117.54. Zscaler, Inc. has a 52 week low of $84.93 and a 52 week high of $194.21. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.16, a current ratio of 2.01 and a quick ratio of 2.01.

Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZSGet Rating) last announced its earnings results on Thursday, March 2nd. The company reported ($0.35) earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of ($0.43) by $0.08. The firm had revenue of $387.60 million for the quarter, compared to…

Source…

2023 SC Awards Finalists: Best Vulnerability Management Solution


Best Vulnerability Management Solution

Tenable – Best Vulnerability Management Solution

Tenable

Tenable, a cybersecurity company, has launched Tenable One, an exposure management platform that provides a unified view of an organization’s assets and vulnerabilities to reduce cyber risk. Tenable One combines the broadest breadth and depth of vulnerability coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps, and identity systems. It uses data science capabilities, including advanced machine learning algorithms, to provide innovative features like Predictive Prioritization, Asset Criticality Rating, and Predictive Scoring. Tenable One helps security practitioners focus on remediating vulnerabilities, improves security managers’ and incident response teams’ efficiency, and provides security executives with accurate risk assessments and actionable metrics. Tenable One eliminates the need for companies to purchase, install and manage hardware and OS, install and update applications, establish and manage high availability, monitor performance and availability, and plan for and deploy additional hardware over time. Tenable One is a SaaS application managed by a single licensing model, making it more cost-effective than the sum of its parts.

Source…