Tag Archive for: game

Arizona AD apologizes for football stadium entry delays, promises improvement for NAU game


Following a less-than-desirable debut of new security measures and a mobile ticketing system at Arizona Stadium, UA athletic director Dave Heeke has issued a formal apology.

“I want to apologize to those who were unable to fully enjoy that exceptional experience,” Heeke said in his Wildcat Wednesday newsletter. “We fell short in our obligation to provide you that experience. For that we sincerely apologize. We did not deliver.”

There were long delays entering the stadium for last week’s home opener against San Diego State, resulting in a very sparse crowd (other than in the Zona Zoo student section) at kickoff. By the time most of the announced crowd of 39,097 was in its seats the Wildcats were down 21-0, ultimately falling 38-14 for their 14th consecutive loss.

Heeke said the athletic department has been working to identify all the things that went wrong and come up with ways to fix them in time for this Saturday’s game against NAU. He said there will be additional staff at each gate and new queueing procedures will be in effect

“Our commitment remains to provide an outstanding game day experience for fans, and that means working tirelessly to resolve issues and deficiencies,” Heeke said. “These important elements of the fan experience will be better when we welcome you all for Saturday’s home football game versus Northern Arizona.”

Though Heeke said the mobile ticketing went well, he noted that ways for fans to help speed things up include making sure their tickets are up on their phone when they approach the gate, and he recommended fans enter at the gate closest to their seats.

Source…

Dogged Persistence – The Name of the Game for One DDoS Attacker


With DDoS, we typically observe a moderate degree of attacker persistence.

DDoS attacks are relatively easy to launch from a number of online booter services, and the availability of cryptocurrencies for payment has made it easy to remain anonymous. Attackers can try their hand at DDoS for little effort and money, and in relative safety. They give it a go, try a few things (vector, endpoint, and scale changes), and for those with effective defenses, the attacker eventually burns out. 

This changed with DDoS extortion campaigns launched primarily between fall 2020 and late spring 2021, which were a pure numbers game. 

extremely-persistent1.png

Attackers cycled through entire industries, launching proof-of-capability attacks en masse against a wide swath of targets, hoping to elicit payment in exchange for a promise not to launch future attacks. Companies that successfully mitigated attacks were generally left alone, as the extortionists moved on to softer targets.

“Once in a blue moon” attack campaign

Every now and then, however, we do see extreme examples of DDoS attacker persistence. This was the case starting late last month (July 2021). What made this particular series of DDoS events notable is not only the determination, but also the attack vector sizes targeting multiple IPs across several of the customer’s subnets.   

Several distinct waves can be noted over the 10-day span that targeted the various endpoints using a diverse array of DDoS tactics and techniques. While the attacker was highly motivated and had massive amounts of bandwidth to burn, nearly all of these attacks were automatically mitigated via Prolexic’s zero-second SLA. Those that weren’t were dealt with swiftly by the Akamai SOCC.

extremely-persistent2.png

The attackers threw in the kitchen sink as they pivoted across multiple IPs and employed a number of attack vectors and combinations whilst attempting to find weak spots. Both TCP and UDP stacks were targeted almost equally, and the criminals used a combination of 11 different vectors during the various assaults. 

extremely-persistent3.png

The threat actors clearly had access to the DDoS attack cannons. One 30-minute span saw 200+ Gbps spread across six destination IPs, with the top target reaching 600+ Gbps.  

extremely-persistent4.png

Source…

The Great Game on the Anniversary of the End of Bretton Woods


August 15 is the 50th anniversary of the end of Bretton Woods, when the US unilaterally ended the last formal linkages between the dollar and gold.  Nixon ushered in the modern era, even if he did not intend to do so.  The only thing that seemed pertinent at the time was that the US did not want to part with any more of its gold, and Nixon feared a recession that would undermine his chances for getting re-elected in 1972. The main demand for US gold was not coming from the Soviet Union or Communist China but from America’s capitalist rivals and allies, primarily in Europe.  

The period after the dollar devalued against gold (and other major currencies) might have been dubbed the first G-zero era.  The US foreign policy in Vietnam undermined its international prestige. Germany’s “ostpolitik” reflected a growing divergence between the US and Europe.  Servan-Schreiber’s international bestseller, “The American Challenge” (1968), accused US multinational companies of colonizing Europe.

However, it proved to be an interregnum. Then, less than a decade after Nixon’s decision, a new era opened, characterized in many respects by turning Bretton Woods on its head.  Currencies floated against the dollar.  Capital was liberated, purposely freed from restrictions on its mobility in several dimensions.  Resistance to new forms of protections, such as Voluntary Export Restrictions and Orderly Market Agreements, ultimately necessitated replacing the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) with the World Trade Organization.  

The US trade balance, and more broadly, the current account balance, was deteriorating years before the capital markets were opened.  This means that historically at least, the export of foreign savings to the US did not cause the external imbalances, even if later America’s capital account surplus contributed to the yawning of the goods deficit.  The capital offensive associated with Reagan-Thatcher came to an end.  It may have ended with the tech bubble in 2001, but we would be inclined to mark the end with the Great Financial Crisis.  

The anniversary of the end of Bretton Woods offers a timely opportunity to reflect on…

Source…

No youthful offender status for Alabama teen accused of wounding 9 at 2019 Mobile football game


An eruption of gunfire at a high school football game in Mobile in August 2019 left players and onlookers running for cover and nine people wounded. The teen charged as the gunman has now been denied a bid for youthful offender status.

Circuit Judge James T. Patterson ruled this week that Deangelo Dejuan Parnell would not be considered a youthful offender. Parnell faces nine counts of attempted murder for the incident, which took place on Aug. 30, 2019, at Ladd-Peebles Stadium during a game between LeFlore and Williamson.

Video from the scene, as well as a series of photos shot by a photographer covering the event for AL.com, show people scrambling and ducking for cover after shots rang out. Six people were treated and released while three more suffered non-life-threatening injuries.

The teen accused of the shooting faces nine counts of attempted murder.

LeFlore and Williamson players take cover after gunfire rings out at the conclusion of the Williamson and LeFlore prep football game Friday, August 30, 2019, at Ladd-Peebles Stadium in Mobile, Ala.Mike Kittrell/AL.com

Parnell, then 17, turned himself in the next day. He entered a plea of not guilty to nine counts of attempted murder. The incident led to immediate moves to improve security at games by weapons screening and other measures, and prompted at least one lawsuit over security.

Within a few days James Barber, then the city’s executive director of public safety, said police analysis indicated that Parnell had been a bystander to a dispute between two other men. Barber said Parnell had pulled a gun once to end the confrontation, then began firing when it resumed a few minutes later.

The question of youthful offender status has involved a dispute over whether prosecutors should be able to submit school records and prison disciplinary records for consideration. Parnell’s attorney raised several objections, including the argument that the records in question hadn’t been authenticated and included handwritten notes “without any indication as [to] the author.”

Prosecutors argued that judges have “almost absolute discretion” over youthful offender status.

“The Youthful Offender report generated as a part of this investigation by the court in itself is filled with hearsay and is permitted as a…

Source…