Tag Archive for: James

It’s now an official maritime war | James J. Marlow


According to Reserve Major General Amos Yadlin, former executive director of the institute for national security studies and former head of IDF military intelligence, Iran recognises it made a mistake when it attacked the commercial “Mercer Street” petroleum tanker last Thursday.

Tehran have no problem killing Israelis, but the deadly drone attack in the Gulf, murdered two crew members from Britain and Romanian.

Intelligence gathered by Britain, United States and Israel all point to Iran being directly responsible, which prompted Boris Johnson to describe the attack as “outrageous”.

The Romanian foreign minister also said that Bucharest would work with international partners on an appropriate response.

Here is the “thing”. The Mercer Street tanker is Japanese owned, with a Liberian flag, operated by a British company, but managed by an Israeli owned Zodiac Maritime, (aka prominent Israeli billionaire Eyal Ofer). So you have to go through three nations, before you reach Israel.

Defence Minister Benny Gantz made all the usual “hard-hitting” threats in the Knesset plenum like “Israel must act against the growing Iranian aggression in the region” and “The Mercer Ship attack is a clear violation of international law.”

But why does Israel have to retaliate? Israel was not attacked. It was Britain and Romania who bore the brunt of the two Iranian drones, which slammed into the vessel off the coast of Oman.

Drones can fly for more than 1500 kilometres and we now know they were launched from either an Iranian vessel or from Iran itself.

It was relatively easy for British, American and Israeli intelligence to ascertain that this was an Iranian attack on a civilian, not military target and Israel should take advantage of the Iranian miscalculation and pursue strong diplomatic, not military steps.

Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan wrote in a letter to Security Council President T. S. Tirumurti of India, “The Security Council should not sit idly by in the face of such violations by Iran or by the terrorist organizations throughout the region that serve as its proxies.”

Iran strives for nuclear capabilities and is sparking a dangerous arms race. It…

Source…

James Bond movies: Ranking 007’s best, worst and everything in between


James Bond actors portrayed at Madame Tussaud's

Not stirred: This lineup at the Madame Tussauds wax museum in Berlin presents all the actors who’ve played James Bond in the legendary Eon Productions movies. From left: Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, George Lazenby and Pierce Brosnan.


Britta Pedersen/Getty Images

The James Bond movie franchise is a juggernaut, with 26 films to date (24 canonical, plus two rogues). From Sean Connery to Daniel Craig, it’s featured six different actors in the lead role, going up against countless power-mad villains and deadly  accomplices, with no shortage of tricked-out cars and outrageous gadgets. Along the way, the 007 franchise has delivered both gems and clunkers.

It’ll be a while longer before we can see how the next Bond movie, No Time to Die, stacks up against its predecessors. That film, likely the final one to star Craig, has been pushed back more than once by coronavirus concerns, and now it’s scheduled to hit theaters on April 2.

While you’re waiting, you can satisfy your Bond cravings by revisiting the older 007 movies, from Connery’s debut in Dr. No all the way to Craig’s most recent outing, Spectre.

If you’re not sure where to start, check out our recommendations and full rundown on big-screen Bond. With the recent death of Connery at 90, you might be inclined to start out with one of his seven turns as 007. (You could maybe also play a vintage Bond video game, or ponder the upcoming “Project 007” from IO Interactive.)

Or you can also take a run through the ranking below of James Bond movies, from worst to best. It’s not arbitrary or one person’s whim — it’s based on an aggregate of movie reviews as compiled by Metacritic. The list…

Source…

Android Circuit: Samsung Galaxy0 Secrets Revealed, Android’s Security Nightmare, New Nokia Leaked By James Bond – Forbes

Android Circuit: Samsung Galaxy0 Secrets Revealed, Android’s Security Nightmare, New Nokia Leaked By James Bond  Forbes
“android security news” – read more

A New ‘Taco Tuesday’ Trademark Challenger Approaches: LeBron James

As we’ve previously discussed, restaurant chain Taco John’s has waged at least a decades-long war to try to pretend that its trademarked term, “Taco Tuesday,” hasn’t become generic. How the chain ever got what sure looks to be a purely descriptive trademark is anyone’s guess, but armed with its trademark the company has since gone after other restaurants big and small for daring to host their own “Taco Tuesdays.” If all of this sounds depressingly stupid to you, well, you’re not wrong.

You really would think the convergence of trademarks and tacos eaten on Tuesday couldn’t get any dumber, except here comes LeBron James. Some background is probably in order. See, LeBron loves tacos. So much so, in fact, that he tends to eat them on many Tuesdays, all while Instagramming his family doing so and affecting a Hispanic accent while shouting about how much he loves Taco Tuesdays. That would have been only mildly interesting at best, except that LeBron’s company has now decided to try to trademark the phrase. Side note: The New York Times should really be better about conflating copyright and trademark law, as you will see below.

On Aug. 15, a company called LBJ Trademarks LLC filed a request with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of Mr. James to copyright “Taco Tuesday.” The company seeks protection for use of the phrase in a host of forums, including “downloadable audio/visual works,” podcasts, social media, online marketing and “entertainment services.” USA Today first reported on the request this weekend.

There are layers of dumb here. First, it seems unlikely that Taco John’s, wielding its own “Taco Tuesday” trademark, wouldn’t be able to claim some level infringement in at least some of these market designations, even assuming the company doesn’t have valid trademark registrations in those categories of its own. But, again, the fact that Taco John’s has those trademarks on a descriptive phrase like “Taco Tuesday” is itself stupid. And, circling back to LeBron, the idea that he would take a phrase already-coined and famous, that he then simply shouted into social media, and then lock it up in a variety of markets is compounding the stupidity.

But just to add a bit more to this, LeBron’s spokesperson basically torpedoed any chance his company has of getting this trademark approved with the following comment.

“The filing was to protect the company from potential lawsuits should we decide to pursue any ideas, nothing of which is in development,” a spokesman for Mr. James said this week on (taco) Tuesday. “It has nothing to do with stopping others from using the term.”

“Should we decide to pursue any ideas, nothing of which is in development” might as well say, “We’re not using this in commerce and don’t have any plans to.” Trademark law requires that the applied for mark be actively used or planned to be used in commerce, or else you don’t get the trademark. Defensive marks like this simply aren’t a thing. If the USPTO is made aware of the spokesperson’s comments, it would be insane to approve this mark.

Meanwhile, the whole Taco Tuesday trademark thing probably needs to just be invalidated to begin with.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Techdirt.