Tag Archive for: Who’s

Who’s responsible for cybersecurity? – PCR-online.biz


PCR-online.biz

Who's responsible for cybersecurity?
PCR-online.biz
Farsight Security CEO Dr. Paul Vixie announced a bleak vision of things to come. “WannaCry recently and now Petya are not the end of an era, but rather the beginning of one,” he said. “The internet security and software industries cannot keep up with

internet security news – read more

Who’s the Real ‘Aggressor in Cyberspace’? US Hypocrisy in Iran Hacker Case – Sputnik International


Sputnik International

Who's the Real 'Aggressor in Cyberspace'? US Hypocrisy in Iran Hacker Case
Sputnik International
This malware, including such viruses as Gauss, Flame and Stuxnet, were supposed to infiltrate and infect computers inside Iran and to disrupt their nuclear energy program. “That was the first time in recorded history that we've seen the use of such a

and more »

flame malware – read more

Apple v. FBI – Who’s for, against opening up the terrorist’s iPhone

Everyone has an opinion
apple vs fbi 1

Apple and the Department of Justice are locked in a court fight over whether the company should disable the anti-brute force mechanism on the iPhone used by the San Bernardino terrorists. Public opinion is split on which side is right, and everyone from tech experts to presidential candidates is weighing in on whether the order actually threatens privacy or whether it’s just a way to find out what’s on that particular phone. Here’s a sampling of comments about the issue from the likes of Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Donald Trump.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

Network World Tim Greene

“Who’s ISIS?” Anonymous’ #OpParis campaign against Islamic State goes awry

The Twitter account of Anonymous’ #OpParis anti-ISIS operation has made some extraordinary claims about its impact—many of which are now being questioned or outright discredited.

A group associated with the Anonymous hacktivist movement launched what they claimed was a “total war” against the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or Daesh), encouraging people to join in an effort allegedly targeting social media accounts associated with the terror organization in response to the attacks in Paris a week ago. Multiple “ops” have been launched in an attempt to crowdsource efforts to disrupt ISIS social media and even hack its members. But there has also been a rash of accusations between those associated with different operations, and it’s not clear that any of them are achieving anything other than drawing attention to Anonymous again.

Seriously, after #OpISIS there have been too many fame whores. It’s not about the follows or RTs. It’s about the truth. Have some integrity.

— Anonymous (@GroupAnon) November 22, 2015

In a video release, self-proclaimed members of #OpParis announced that they had taken down 20,000 Twitter accounts associated with ISIS. Individuals associated with the operation also claim to have alerted law enforcement to planned ISIS attacks in the US and Paris.

However, many of the accounts targeted by an automated Twitter reporting script that the group has distributed via links from its chat channel have nothing to do with the Islamic State. And the FBI has discounted that information, releasing a statement that “we do not have specific or credible information of an attack at this time.” The US attack claimed to have been uncovered by Anonymous members was allegedly targeting a WWE wrestling event in Atlanta tonight.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ars Technica » Technology Lab